Epic and Dragon comparison – Part 1, Overexposure

This post might become lengthy…

And the images come from Dragons original OLPF.
But as this is what is currently the mostly available config (and the cameras I rent), it is still a slightly relevant comparison.
I will come with some analysis on Dragon and a few other cameras, as time allows, but this is the most “Ready” images I have at the moment.

I will NOT take it through every stop imaginable. Instead I will focus on the parts that mostly interest me, and break down the things I find interesting, which means that I will treat the exposures a bit differently to look into what I find interesting about them.

RAW files will follow each example and analysis.

First, the overexposure.
Note: I did NOT use DRX to clean up Epic highlights for these examples, as it is easier to see where Epic clips by leaving the magenta in.
I know it is easily taken away in post.

 

 

Exposure 1. (and for this test “Base” exposure)

First example is developed with linear/ISO 320 (Click on the images to look at the full-size 2k images)

01_Dragonepic_320_lin_ab

 

Same exposure and development – area of interest 1:1 pixel (unscaled) from both cameras.

01_Dragonepic_320_lin_ab_1_1

 

 

And finally, the same exposure developed at “reference settings” RedLogFilm/ISO 800

01_Dragon_800_rlf_AB_2k

The difference in highlights handling between the two cameras are striking both in capacity and rolloff.

The RAW files for the first exposure

 

Exposure 2 – One stop down.

This time, too I start off with the linear/320 image.

As it seems, all “critical” parts of the Dragon Image, is now within range, while his right chin, the flower, the dolls (and a lot of the rest of the frame), is still clearly clipped in the Epic frame.
The Dragon frame is only overexposed in the mirror and in the lightbulbs (that is 300 watts fired off directly into the camera on the old “flary” OLPF BTW)

You also see how the Epic image flattens close to clip on his chin.
The Dragon seems to hold all the way up.

The difference in saturation in the top-end of the range is also clearly visible in this example.
Look at the flower, the dolls and his face.

CA is from the lens (superspeed MK III)

Again, click on the images to see fullsize, and zoom in to 1:1 if you have to to get the 1:1 pixle image)

02_Dragonepic_320_lin_ab

 

 

Again I focus on his skin and hair to look into the different characteristics close to and around clip.
This is unscaled 1:1 pixels from both cameras. The Dragon does thus NOT gain anything from higher oversampling in this example.
Still the details and nuansces and general “richness” of the Dragon shines.

02_Dragonepic_800_rlf_ab_1_1

 

 

Finally – the 2k/ISO 800 Red Log Film scaled image from both cameras.
Pretty much speaks for itself.

02_Dragon_800_rlf_AB_2k

 

Download the R3D’s for this exposure here

 

And by this I end part one of this comparison. Next part will concentrate on the “fat” exposures.
Watch this space…

If you like me to publish tests and have use of what I do, I do accept and appreciate contributions to the work through Paypal




______________________________________________________________________________________________
All imagery on gunleik.com is © Gunleik Groven, unless otherwise stated. For TFP shoots, the images belong to me and the model.
It is possible to buy most images for editorial, commercial or stock usage. I’ll even sell you large prints of them….
Contact: gunleikgroven@gmail.com

No comments yet.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.